- Home
- Articles and White Papers
- Sustainability
Cardionetics Ambulatory ECG Monitors
Sustainability
This article describes how using the C.Net5000 ambulatory ECG monitor in general practice creates a significant improvement in health service efficiency. The improvements are sustainable in both the short term and the longer term, as is evidenced by the hundreds of existing users over the last eight years.
Annual indicative budgetary benefits are based on 30 patient referrals from a typical primary care practice to secondary care, valued at £378 per referral, with the service redesign leading to an annual saving of £5,067.
A resting ECG is inappropriate for detecting intermittent arrhythmia, a 24-hour ambulatory ECG being the preferred alternative. However this usually means a referral to a cardiology outpatient department, which can result in some patients waiting periods of up to 26 to 40 weeks for ambulatory monitoring.
Results from a published study [1] show that of the patients referred to a cardiologist, up to 60% do not have any serious cardiac arrhythmia, so the referral may not have been necessary, while 6 to 8% are at risk of life-threatening arrhythmia.
Making ambulatory cardiac monitoring devices available directly to primary care practices allows GPs to monitor and analyse arrhythmias as soon as the patient presents.
In line with the National Service Framework guidance for cardiac arrhythmia [2], patients are managed more effectively by monitoring their cardiac rhythm for 24 hours following a first visit to the GP, and reviewing the arrhythmia report:
- If symptoms were recorded but no arrhythmia detected, referral is unnecessary, on the grounds of no arrhythmia detected during symptomatic events.
- If symptoms were not recorded, repeat the assessment and consider referral to a cardiologist.
- If the report shows cardiac arrhythmias, send the report to the cardiologist for confirmation of urgent or non-urgent referral.
In addition to receiving more timely diagnosis and treatment, patients following this redesigned service in general practice experience a positive impact on their wellbeing together with reduced anxiety levels and psychological issues associated with cardiac problems.
Existing patient pathway |
New patient pathway |
![]() |
![]() |
The criteria for success is seen as a reduction in the number of referrals to cardiology outpatient departments in the short term and a reduction in the number of accident and emergency admissions from stroke in the longer term. These can be determined by annual measurements of:
- The number of patients assessed.
- The number of referrals to cardiology outpatient departments.
- The number of patients requiring urgent referral.
- The number of emergency admissions due to cardiac arrhythmia.
As an example, consider a primary care practice that currently refers 30 patients each year to a cardiology outpatient department for investigation of possible intermittent cardiac arrhythmia. The data below shows estimated benefit per patient of at least £168.90 when this service redesign is implemented.
| Table 1. Current cost per test, based on PSSRU cost assessment figures [3] |
|
| First visit to GP (11.7 minutes) | £30.00 |
| Cardiology outpatient appointment | £117.00 |
| OPD 12 lead ECG | £39.00 |
| Cardiology nurse (fitting and removal of recorder) | £43.00 |
| 30-minute analysis by cardiac technician | £43.00 |
| Follow-up visit with consultant | £76.00 |
| Second visit to GP (11.7 minutes) | £30.00 |
| Total | £378.00 |
| Table 2. Cost per test performed in primary care, based on C.Net5000 studies |
|
| First visit to GP (11.7 minutes) | £30.00 |
| Practice nurse fits and removes monitor (15 minutes) | £7.50 |
| Next day return visit (11.7 minutes) | £30.00 |
| Total | £67.50 |
Using the figures from the above two tables, the cost saving resulting from service redesign is shown in Tables 3 and 4.
| Table 3. Cost comparison of existing and new patient pathways | |||
| No. of patients per Year | Cost per patient | Cost per year | |
| Existing patient pathway | |||
| Patients referred to cardiology OPD | 30 | £378.00 | £11,340.00 |
| Patients treated locally | None | — | — |
| New patient pathway | |||
| Local monitoring cost | 12 (40%) | £67.50 | £5,058.00 |
| Referral to cardiology OPD | + £378.00 | ||
| (First visit to GP excluded from cost of cardiology OPD referral) | − £30.00 | ||
| 60% of patients treated locally | 18 | £67.50 | £1,215.00 |
| Total cost of redesigned service | £6,273.00 | ||
| Table 4. Cost saving following service redesign | |
| Total annual saving | £5,067.00 |
| Average saving per patient (based on 30 patients per year) |
£168.90 |
| Practice-based commissioning 70% recommended reimbursement to the Practice, per patient |
£118.23 |
References
[1] P. Standing, M. Dent, A. Craig, B. Glenville, Changes in referral patterns to cardiac outpatient clinics with ambulatory ECG monitoring in general practice, British Journal of Cardiology, 2001, Vol. 8 No. 6, pp. 394–398.
[2] The National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease: Chapter 8, Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death, 2007. View
[3] Unit Costs of Health and Social Care, Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, 2007. View

